At the very end of his book, Sanjaya Baru, who worked at close quarters with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as his Media Adviser during UPA 1 from 2004 to 2009, draws analogies from the Mahabharata to summarise Dr. Manmohan Singh’s success as a leader. He rubbishes the analogy that Manmohan Singh had been like Shikhandi – the half man half woman character who shielded Arjuna during battle with Bheeshma; it was common knowledge that the latter would not strike against a woman and could it be that Manmohan too shielded his party from attacks with stoic silence? This characterisation was initially attributed to BJP’s Yashwant Sinha. Baru disagrees. He also wonders if Manmohan Singh could be likened to Dhritrashtra, the blind king who unhappily presided over his strife-torn kingdom, ignoring the wrongs. Going further on this mythological journey, Baru favours a comparison of his boss with Bheeshma himself; for all his brilliance, Bheeshma had been mocked by Dropadi for taking refuge of finer points of religion when he could not defend her while she was disrobed in public. Was Dr. Manmohan Singh the Bheeshma who presided over scams while maintaining the highest standards of personal probity due to a misplaced sense of loyalty?
For five years, Sanjaya Baru was privy to a slice of history as it was made. His book reveals what he saw though, as many have pointed out, the overall picture of Prime minister Manmohan Singh that emerges is not radically different from the popular perception of him as an honest and dedicated man, self effacing, humble and decent, whose failure lay in lack of display of leadership qualities and who allowed the Party (‘the Family’) dictate the narrative. To Baru, the subservience of this scholar was baffling and he concludes that it was a stratagem for his own political survival. This may be an unkind deduction but Baru makes it with a hint of exasperation and sadness.
But contrary to the popular uproar in the media, the book is not entirely unkind to Dr. Manmohan Singh. On the contrary, in most part, it unreservedly extols the Prime Minister and credits him both the victory of UPA 1 in 2009 and the Indo-US Nuclear deal. Baru is mostly affectionate in his tone towards Manmohan Singh and severely critical of those who were malevolent in their intent towards the Prime Minister. Among the many who do not come out well from these pages are Karat of CPM, Mani Shankar Iyer, Prithviraj Chavan, Natwar Singh and, of course, the Family.
The book makes an attempt to redress the balance of history in Manmohan Singh’s favour. But that alone is not clearly the purpose of the book because it also shines light on Manmohan Singh’s warts and moles. To a lay reader, it appears to be a balanced account, though this is hardly a characterisation that anyone from Congress would agree with. Many in the ruling party have already painted Baru as a back-stabber, someone who chose the period of General Elections when the Congress party is battling for survival, to release this book. I can’t agree – isn’t that how books are timed for release?
The Accidental Prime Minister – a rather accurate title – is an easy read. It is not a story with dramatic twists and a red-hot plot. All the same, it is a gripping account and provides part of the explanation why the Congress is staring down the barrel today.